<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speaking of Censorship&#8230;..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bookpeopleblog.wordpress.com/2008/09/26/speaking-of-censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bookpeopleblog.wordpress.com/2008/09/26/speaking-of-censorship/</link>
	<description>Austin&#039;s favorite bookstore since 1970</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:00:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://bookpeopleblog.wordpress.com/2008/09/26/speaking-of-censorship/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 03:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookpeopleblog.wordpress.com/?p=309#comment-63</guid>
		<description>If a kid wants to get a book like that (or &quot;worse&quot;), they&#039;ll find a way. Parents who think they can keep their kids from material like that if the kids want to see it/read it/watch it...well, they&#039;re living in a dream world!

So what should we do with &quot;objectionable&quot; content in a public library? Any kid could come in and check out a YA book with content like this. Are we going to propose limits there too? Where does it end? What&#039;s &quot;racy&quot; to one person isn&#039;t to another. So do we go with least common denominator?

Just seems like a slippery slope to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a kid wants to get a book like that (or &#8220;worse&#8221;), they&#8217;ll find a way. Parents who think they can keep their kids from material like that if the kids want to see it/read it/watch it&#8230;well, they&#8217;re living in a dream world!</p>
<p>So what should we do with &#8220;objectionable&#8221; content in a public library? Any kid could come in and check out a YA book with content like this. Are we going to propose limits there too? Where does it end? What&#8217;s &#8220;racy&#8221; to one person isn&#8217;t to another. So do we go with least common denominator?</p>
<p>Just seems like a slippery slope to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kester Smith</title>
		<link>http://bookpeopleblog.wordpress.com/2008/09/26/speaking-of-censorship/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Kester Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookpeopleblog.wordpress.com/?p=309#comment-59</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m torn. I think banning a book (denying a person access to it) is wrong. However, I don&#039;t see a problem with certain restrictions. This book is still available to any kid whose parents want them to read it. They aren&#039;t being denied the right to read it any more than BookPeople denies middle schoolers the right to look at porn (not that I&#039;m comparing this book to porn). However, we do keep certain materials behind the counter so that just anyone can&#039;t access it. And I don&#039;t view that as censorship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m torn. I think banning a book (denying a person access to it) is wrong. However, I don&#8217;t see a problem with certain restrictions. This book is still available to any kid whose parents want them to read it. They aren&#8217;t being denied the right to read it any more than BookPeople denies middle schoolers the right to look at porn (not that I&#8217;m comparing this book to porn). However, we do keep certain materials behind the counter so that just anyone can&#8217;t access it. And I don&#8217;t view that as censorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
